THE CE NOMINATION PROCESS WHICH INCLUDES LETTERS OF SUPPORT IS RECOMMENDED. Letters from other employees or constituents are encouraged and helpful as a way of providing the selection committee with a more complete understanding of the contribution of the nominated employee. The selection committee will use only the information furnished by the nominator(s). In the 'Comments' section below, please explain in detail why you believe the nominee(s) is deserving of recognition. Describe the specific actions or activities of the nominee(s) that pertain to the criteria listed below.
Nomination is Based on the Following Criterion(a): and should reflect the nominee’s contribution to the campus community during the past 12 months in one or more of the following areas. Please describe in the (COMMENTS) section:
Category 1: A suggestion and/or special achievement which is a one-time occurrence. This category places emphasis on suggestions that contribute to improved university operations and/or special achievements in community activities.
Category 2: Performance that has exceeded job requirements as a one‑time occurrence; i.e., overcoming unusual difficulties on a particular project or exemplary handling of an emergency situation related to employment.
Category 3: High‑quality performance, above what is normally found in the type of position concerned and sustained over a period of service; i.e., continually maintaining or providing the means to increase productivity and output or other kinds of ongoing performance that far exceeds job requirements. Special service to the university outside normal job duties (e.g., committee work) can be considered in this category.
Describe the Activity or Project: (Note: Activity or project must be currently underway or completed in the past 12 months.)
1. What was or will be accomplished and how?
2. What is/was nominee's role in accomplishment?
3. What is the impact of activity or project, such as monetary savings, improved morale, or improved community relations. Describe in detail.